JUDICIAL INSURRECTION! The Stealing of the 2024 Election.

This reeks of Obama, Hillary, and the Shadow Government / Deep State.

This is a chart that was developed during the writing of our Australian Bill of Individual Rights, and the graphic came from my Australian counterpart as we were trying to devise a way to graph, Liberty.

https://writeyourlaws.com/australian-bill-of-rights

I thought this would demonstrate where we are in terms of our Federal Judiciary. That would be at the bottom Left. Maximum Tyranny. That is because the Judiciary has completely left the Constitution, and is issuing orders and decrees with no legal authority to do so, and no one in the other branches of government is stopping them. This is Judicial Tyranny!

Individual freedom is also at the bottom because the Judges are ordering stops to everything that Trump is doing, and everything the previous occupation government from the stolen election of 2020 did is being made to continue. This effectively nullifies the entire national vote, the entire Electoral College, the State Legislatures who certified their electors, and all the people who voted. So once again, a national, presidential election, has been stolen, for the second time in a row, by the Judiciary this time, through an endless series of orders, restraints, stays, injunctions, lawsuits, findings, hearings, and cases that ALWAYS rule against President Trump.

There are so many bogus judicial orders, so quickly, covering so many areas, from so many different judges, all of whom are Leftist, that one can only conclude this is organized, coordinated, planned, and designed specifically to neutralize and destroy the entire Trump Administration. A Coup d’Etat, in fact, again, and it’s being done by the only people who are organized to can actually stop a Coup, our federal government. That’s their job, to safeguard our rights, protect our property, and defend our lives. Instead they are safeguarding their budgets, protecting their power and control, and defending their jobs, all at our expense. Short of revolution there must be a way to stop this, and that is what we shall explore next.

So how did we get here? It all started in 1803 with the worst, and most illegal and unconstitutional opinion, ever written from a case before the Supreme Court. The infamous “Marbury v Madison.” The details of the case are painfully insignificant compared to what the Supreme Court and John Marshall Chief Judge (Constitution says Judge, not Justice) did with the pretense of resolving a case. If you’re curious, here’s a link to the case:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/5/137

This is the case where the Supreme Court engaged in probably the most unconstitutional thing a federal entity can do, and that is to create and use a power they simply made up for themselves. John Marshall in the unanimous opinion wrote that “the Courts” have this extraordinary, unconstitutional power, known as “Judicial Review.” One of the worst sentences on this usurpation of power in the opinion is this:

“141 — It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.”

What this means is that the law doesn’t say what it is, the courts do! And where does this authority come from? Why, the courts themselves! Because they said so! They don’t need no stinking Constitution. They can just write in one of their opinions that they have this whole new extraordinary power, that’s not delegated, not even discussed, they simply declared it to be so, and it was so. Well, no it’s not. No federal government entity can create its own power. That’s why we have a Constitution, to specifically avoid and prevent this happening. And if it does there are remedies for the rest of government in the series of checks and balances. What continues to baffle me is why this one branch of government has achieved the status of being untouchable, unquestionable, and some kind of supremacist cult that can simply rule by decree? That is how the courts have been able to take over and destroy the Trump Administration — because the Trump Administration has so far, let them!

The courts take the laws as some kind of a guideline, maybe, and then THEY tell you what the law is according to them, as if you couldn’t read it for yourself, or understand it for yourself. It is THEY who will “interpret,” in other words, define in any way they wish, usually by just making stuff up, what they want the law to say, so their pre-conceived verdicts and decisions, will match the tainted evidence and solicited testimony. This is backwards of course, and probably illegal. It definitely nullifies the Congress and the laws duly passed by Congress, thus illegally transferring legislative power to the judiciary.

But it’s not just “judicial review” that is the problem, its absolute authority over laws, regulations, policies, budgets, the States, local governments, with no checks, balances, or redress, from those entities to the powers the courts have assumed in the name of judicial review. And it’s more that just — review, it’s really judicial oversight, approval, or denial, of everything from the other federal branches of government, and over all the States and local governments, and that was never meant to happen. Judicial review means striking down or abolishing any law, regulation, policy or budget they say is unconstitutional, because they, the courts, “INTERPRET” the Constitution, which means THEY say what the Constitution says, regardless what is actually written in the Constitution. The Courts have given themselves the power over the Congress and the President, to make any ruling, force any policy, cut or keep any appropriation, cut or maintain any program, strike or maintain any law, strike or maintain any executive order, in short, the Supreme Court is “supreme” over the entire country, because they have declared themselves supreme over the Constitution.

*** The truth is the Supreme Court is only supreme over the lower federal courts and judges, and Marbury v Madison, like Rowe v Wade, must be overturned by the Supreme Court, or abolished, by Congress and the President.

This will help you understand the powers without limits that the Judiciary has assumed for themselves. Here is my video on the "Seven Most Important Minutes of the Kavanaugh Hearing:"

So how does the Constitution work? First, our most important founding principle is that the people are the ultimate authority. We have a government of the people, not a people of the government. See my article, “The Nation of Government,” for that.

https://gregpenglis.substack.com/p/the-nation-of-government

Our ultimate principle is individual rights. All our founding documents ultimately break down to defining and protecting individual rights, including especially the delegated powers of government. We are a country of “These” United States, not “The” United States. Big difference. It means that our “States” are like independent nations. They created a small federal government to do the things the independent States had failed to do, or to resolve. That federal government has ONLY the delegated powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution, which was created, and ratified, by the States. If it wasn’t delegated by the States to the federal government, they can’t do it, period! Just to make sure the federal and later all governments within the U.S. knew what they were absolutely prohibited from touching, the States ratified The Bill of Rights. The 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights mandates to the federal government, that “ALL” powers not specifically delegated in the Constitution, to the federal government, are reserved to the States, or to the People.

The powers delegated to the Supreme Court by the States, and such inferior courts as the Congress shall create, are enumerated in Article III of the Constitution.

Article III Section 1. Says in part: “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress shall from time to time establish.”

So the only entity the Constitution creates and mandates is one supreme court, not even “capitalized” in the text. Every other creation of the federal judiciary can only come from Congress, which means full jurisdiction over everything in the federal judiciary, except the supreme court, is UNDER the Authority of — Congress. Since the power to establish also contains the power to revoke, the simple answer to revoking this judicial tyranny is simply to abolish whatever judgeships in whatever courts are violating the Constitution by exceeding their delegated authority. So the short answer to the myriad judges issuing bogus opinions in a coordinated effort to sabotage and destroy the Trump Administration, is for Congress to simply abolish those courts. This could be the district, circuit, or appellate courts, because any court, except the supreme court, exists solely at the pleasure of Congress. Therefore — Congress could simply abolish any court with any corrupt judge. No court, no judge of that court, no cases for or from that court. Problem solved…

Article III, Section 1, again in part: “The Judges (not “Justices”) both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during terms of good Behavior.”

So what does this mean? It means that any judge of any court, up through the supreme court, is still under the authority and jurisdiction of Congress. Whereas members of Congress are under the absurd assumption, for which nothing exists in the Constitution, that only through impeachment and trial can judges be removed, the truth is that the process is far easier, and has a far lower threshold bar to be reached. Impeachment requires high crimes and misdemeanors. Bad behavior simply means they suck at their job and are doing it wrong. I would say that judges making up their own authority, power, and irrational decisions and actions, more than qualifies as bad behavior. So again, the simple remedy for this crisis of usurped judicial power is for the Congress to simply remove the offending judges for their bad behavior.

But Congress, doesn’t read the Constitution, or they would know this.

You know who else doesn’t read the Constitution? The Trump Administration, and all their lawyers, or they would be submitting bills to Congress to have every one of the bogus judges and their illegal rulings, removed for bad behavior. So they could solve this crisis as well, just as easily as Congress, and working together, it could be over in a day. That’s how long it takes to pass a 4,000 word, multi-trillion dollar continuing resolution to fund the government. Coming up with a list of corrupt judges and voting them out for bad behavior is child’s play by comparison.

Showtime - Weekdays 7-10 am Central time!

https://rumble.com/c/ActionRadioRumble

From the questions no one has thought to ask, to the answers no one has thought to consider, to the actions no one has dared to take. That is "Action Radio!"

You can see how easily this rogue and defiant Judiciary, both judges and courts, can simply be disciplined, constrained, or eliminated, by the other two branches, the President and the Congress. This lack of exercising the constitutional authority delegated to the President and the Congress to check the Judiciary, has resulted in the Judiciary exercising illegal powers, ever since those powers were made up by imagination, by John Marshall and the Supreme Court in Marbury v Madison in 1803.

Just to be thorough, let’s look at some of the groupings of cases the judges are ruling on, and once again using the Constitution and federal laws, see how easy it would be to simply eliminate the cases and rulings. The one good thing said in the Marbury v Madison opinion is that any law repugnant to the Constitution doesn’t exist. Therefore, in the same way, any judge’s actions or rulings repugnant to the Constitution, don’t exist either, and the President should proceed under that opinion by simply ignoring repugnant judges.

Birthright Citizenship:

This category of rulings is easy for President Trump to ignore and declare null and void simply because there is no such thing as birthright citizenship. The Center for Immigration Studies has published articles on how this is neither law, nor regulation, nor even recorded policy, it’s basically just an assumption, and a wrong one at that. The 14th Amendment prohibits anything even remotely like it with the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause in Section I, which says that only people born to American parents (add permanent residents on a green card) are subject to U.S. jurisdiction. All foreign nationals and aliens are subject to their own country of citizenship, and can not give birth to American citizens, not just in the U.S., but anywhere.

Go to one of the primary writers of the 14th Amendment, Senator Howard Jacob, who said:

“Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

No foreigners or aliens! Get it! What this means, because the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, everyone born after 1868, is subject to its jurisdiction. Now, ex-post facto means after the fact, which means you can’t be prosecuted for something you did before it was against the law. But, putting U.S. Citizen on any birth certificate when the parents were foreign nationals or aliens means that those birth certificates can be corrected back to the citizenship of the parents, are you ready — back to 1868!

Job Cuts:

Another whole class of cases are judges saying Trump can’t fire or layoff people that work for him in his Executive branch. This is absurd. Even the Congressional Research Service in their analysis of the Office of Management and Budget, lists personnel management, including separation (firing) is their job, and OMB works for the President. How could it be possible that the President, who is in charge of the entire executive branch of government, not be able to fire people, when they have the power to hire people?

Now, civil service is a mess and I’m not sure all the details of how to fire or layoff folks given that. But the cure from Trump’s first term, which needs to be brought back, is Schedule F, which takes entire classes of government employees from civil service to “at will” like the rest of us, which means they can be fired, like the rest of us. I would argue that civil service job protections are discriminatory, because that doesn’t exist for the private sector. Isn’t that segregation? Isn’t that a civil rights violation? Isn’t that a violation of the 14th Amendment equal protection clause since civil service doesn’t protect non-government employees as well?

Where the real problem is with personnel management cases is government unions. FDR thought them illegal. They didn’t exist until JFK, who created them out of nothing with an executive order. Since executive orders have to be based in statutory authority from Congress or they don’t exist, for a while after the executive order, those government unions didn’t exist. Then Congress eventually passed the legislation to make the executive order legal. So the solution is for Congress to repeal any law legalizing a government union, and for Trump to repeal Kennedy’s executive order.

Budget Cuts:

The last major category I’ll cover is all the wasteful, fraudulent and stupid spending by the unaccountable, hidden, Deep State bureaucrats who are running a secret shadow government of their own. This alone is unconstitutional and illegal as there is no provision for any power to go to an “administrative state,” also known as a 4th branch of government. So, just as it was illegal and unconstitutional for the Judiciary to give themselves the imaginary power of judicial review, it is just as illegal and unconstitutional for the Executive to give themselves the power to create regulations and spending, all by themselves. Which means when the President, and now the Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E.), cut unauthorized spending by the administrative secret state, they are completely within their power to do so. The Constitution expressly provides for the President to be vested with all executive powers. That means control of the executive agencies and departments, and that means, control of spending and personnel. Congress appropriates the money, but it is the President who actually spends it, or withholds it for various reasons. If Congress has a problem, they can wrestle with the President, and a case between the two might end up before the Supreme Court, but it is specifically outside of the Judiciary to order spending, or to order the withholding of spending, all by themselves. It is, outside their jurisdiction and authority, and all such rulings by the judges and courts are therefore moot. They are, repugnant to the Constitution.

The Cult of the Judiciary:

I don’t know why, but when anyone puts on a black robe, sits at the highest desk in a courtroom, or writes — anything, people go all weak and limp and simply do as they are told. This is madness. This is definitely a judicial cult. “Yes master.” That’s what the Congress says, the President says, the governors say, the mayors, and all the way down the judicial “chain of command” to the lowliest public employee. They all simply give up their soul, and just follow orders. Can you explain this? I can’t. Take Rowe v Wade, the abortion case. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court ends with the parties to their cases, which arise UNDER the Constitution in law and equity (fairness, not modern social justice). That’s in Section 2 of Article III. This means that everything the court so-called “ordered” in Rowe v Wade, was moot before the ink was dry. There is no such order power, so their orders, rules, policies, regulations, or laws, were all repugnant to the Constitution, and therefore didn’t exist. Which meant that no entity outside of Rowe, or Wade, had any reason to acknowledge the case, and, since abortion is not an Article 1, Section 8 power delegated to the federal government, no part of the federal government has jurisdiction anyway. The States therefore have always been free to regulate abortion in their States, regardless of Rowe v Wade. But they didn’t… Why? The cult of the judiciary.

So, the powers of the Supreme Court and their opinions are UNDER the Constitution, not equal to it, and certainly not supreme over it. That’s why no court or judge can “interpret” the Constitution, or any law, regulation or policy. The policies, regulations, laws, and the Constitution all say what they mean, in the language they are written in. All the judges and courts can do is decide cases by USING laws, regulations, maybe policies, and definitely the Constitution. And, their powers end with the parties to the case. They can not make regulation or policy, nor can they issue orders, stays, injunctions, or strike down laws or regulations as we said earlier. All of that is judicial review, the exercise of which is unconstitutional.

Trump’s Declaration:

The obvious solution is for President Trump to declare, to the world, that the federal judiciary is stealing the 2024 Election, just as the 2020 Election was stolen, with disastrous results, and no legal accountability. This can’t happen again. Trump should declare for all the reasons in this article that it is the courts and judges who are breaking the law, and violating the Constitution, and are therefore repugnant to the Constitution, and are not even worthy of consideration or notice, let alone obeying or complying. Trump should say that he will continue on course, with his policies and actions, and if the courts have a problem, then write opinions at the conclusion of the cases before them, but just as people are innocent until proven guilty, Trump’s policies are in effect, until proven illegal or unconstitutional. This is a valid check of the executive, on the judiciary. Trump should call upon Congress to exercise their constitutional authority to abolish rogue courts running amok, and remove any judge engaging in bad behavior.

The solution to this Judicial Insurrection is remarkably simple. Unfortunately the willpower to do it is so far non-existent…

Rumble.com/c/ActionRadioRumble - is our current show on Rumble!

https://writeyourlaws.com - is where we do all our legislative and advocacy work.

https://pay.writeyourlaws.com - Is our GoDaddy contributions fundraising site.

https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/action-radio-with-greg-penglis--6449184 - Is the link to my previous weekday show.